Evaluation
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias.
The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy.
The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality.
The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice.
The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care.
The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent.
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
1. Analyze key concepts and evidence for wearable use and interpretation to explain their relevance to military training and operations.
2. Apply at least two strategies (environment versus form factor) or frameworks (technology acceptance model) discussed in the presentation to real-world scenarios within the military.
3. Identify the components of self-perceived readiness using the (Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale) ARMS framework.
4. Explain how physical and cognitive readiness factors influence performance.
5. Interpret the relationship between self-perceived readiness and perceptual-cognitive performance.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*