Evaluation
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias.
The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy.
The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality.
The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice.
The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care.
The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent.
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
Explain the expectations set for the CORE Military Medical Treatment Facilities (MTFs) and illustrate how they align with broader DHA goals.
Interpret the Reconciliation Funding and investment strategies in MTFs to demonstrate their impact on Access to Care and Readiness.
Demonstrate how to apply best practices in specialty care access, template management, and appointing to enhance Prime capacity.
Describe the universal privileging process and analyze its implications for Clinical Quality Management.
Summarize how to maintain solvency in IRIS, explain incentive structures, and evaluate data quality related to performance and personnel availability.
Recognize current capabilities and challenges within MHS GENESIS and Revenue Cycle and discuss potential future enhancements.
Identify and explain strategies to leverage DHA capabilities in support of CORE goals to “keep care in and bring care in.”
Interpret the Human Capital Distribution Plan, DM2 model, and MTF Unit Manning Document to illustrate their role in workforce planning.
Explain the importance of MTF maintenance and equipment in sustaining operational readiness.
Describe the current TRICARE T-5 contract and summarize its key provisions.
Outline the DoD VA Strategic Objectives and identify opportunities for interagency collaboration.
Summarize effective communication and public affairs strategies across DHA, Networks, and MTFs to enhance stakeholder engagement.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*