Evaluation
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias.
The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy.
The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality.
The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice.
The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care.
The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent.
The venue for the activity was accessible, clean, and accommodating for learning.
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
1. Annie Eckardt, PsyD. Presenter has no financial or non-financial relationships to disclose.
2. Rick Heyman, PhD. Presenter has no financial or non-financial relationships to disclose.
3. Jasara Hogan, PhD. Presenter has no financial or non-financial relationships to disclose.
4. Amy Slep, PhD. Presenter has no financial or non-financial relationships to disclose.
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
1. Define level 1 and target population; Identify rationale for level 1 programming; Explain the structure and parameters of Level 1 Reboot.
2. Describe the essential findings from the gambling meta-review and the electronics addictions meta-review.
3. Identify the different theories and evidenced-based practice included in Aftercare; recognize the techniques and summarize the goals.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*