How much do you agree with the following statements? *

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Slightly disagree	Neither	Slightly agree	Agree	Strongly agree
The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias.	The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias. - Strongly disagree	The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias. - Disagree	The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias. - Slightly disagree	The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias. - Neither	The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias. - Slightly agree	The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias. - Agree	The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias. - Strongly agree
The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy.	The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy. - Strongly disagree	The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy. - Disagree	The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy. - Slightly disagree	The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy. - Neither	The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy. - Slightly agree	The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy. - Agree	The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy. - Strongly agree
The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality.	The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality. - Strongly disagree	The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality. - Disagree	The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality. - Slightly disagree	The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality. - Neither	The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality. - Slightly agree	The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality. - Agree	The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality. - Strongly agree
The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice.	The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice. - Strongly disagree	The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice. - Disagree	The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice. - Slightly disagree	The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice. - Neither	The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice. - Slightly agree	The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice. - Agree	The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice. - Strongly agree
The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care.	The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care. - Strongly disagree	The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care. - Disagree	The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care. - Slightly disagree	The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care. - Neither	The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care. - Slightly agree	The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care. - Agree	The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care. - Strongly agree
The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent.	The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent. - Strongly disagree	The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent. - Disagree	The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent. - Slightly disagree	The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent. - Neither	The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent. - Slightly agree	The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent. - Agree	The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent. - Strongly agree

The activity successfully achieved its learning objectives by enhancing my ability to: *

	Strongly disagree	Disagree	Slightly disagree	Neither	Slightly agree	Agree	Strongly agree
Interpret the use of the APACHE II scoring system in assessing injury severity in conflict zones.	Interpret the use of the APACHE II scoring system in assessing injury severity in conflict zones. - Strongly disagree	Interpret the use of the APACHE II scoring system in assessing injury severity in conflict zones. - Disagree	Interpret the use of the APACHE II scoring system in assessing injury severity in conflict zones. - Slightly disagree	Interpret the use of the APACHE II scoring system in assessing injury severity in conflict zones. - Neither	Interpret the use of the APACHE II scoring system in assessing injury severity in conflict zones. - Slightly agree	Interpret the use of the APACHE II scoring system in assessing injury severity in conflict zones. - Agree	Interpret the use of the APACHE II scoring system in assessing injury severity in conflict zones. - Strongly agree
Analyze casualty projections in large-scale military operations using war-game simulations.	Analyze casualty projections in large-scale military operations using war-game simulations. - Strongly disagree	Analyze casualty projections in large-scale military operations using war-game simulations. - Disagree	Analyze casualty projections in large-scale military operations using war-game simulations. - Slightly disagree	Analyze casualty projections in large-scale military operations using war-game simulations. - Neither	Analyze casualty projections in large-scale military operations using war-game simulations. - Slightly agree	Analyze casualty projections in large-scale military operations using war-game simulations. - Agree	Analyze casualty projections in large-scale military operations using war-game simulations. - Strongly agree
Evaluate the role of predictive modeling and scoring systems in military medical readiness and response.	Evaluate the role of predictive modeling and scoring systems in military medical readiness and response. - Strongly disagree	Evaluate the role of predictive modeling and scoring systems in military medical readiness and response. - Disagree	Evaluate the role of predictive modeling and scoring systems in military medical readiness and response. - Slightly disagree	Evaluate the role of predictive modeling and scoring systems in military medical readiness and response. - Neither	Evaluate the role of predictive modeling and scoring systems in military medical readiness and response. - Slightly agree	Evaluate the role of predictive modeling and scoring systems in military medical readiness and response. - Agree	Evaluate the role of predictive modeling and scoring systems in military medical readiness and response. - Strongly agree

What do you anticipate changing or how will you apply what you learned in your professional practice? *

How will you apply what you learned when working with providers of other disciplines or members of your interprofessional healthcare team? *

What barriers, if any, do you see to implementing these changes? *

Please provide feedback on your experience navigating this website and completing the CE process. *

Based on your educational needs, what topics would you like to see addressed in future educational activities? *

Please discuss any additional concerns or comments about this program and indicate whether the program met your expectations. *

attestation checkbox *

I completed this educational activity independently and in its entirety.

Leave this field blank