Evaluation
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
The activity presented balanced, evidence-based content free of commercial bias.
The presenter(s) used an effective teaching strategy.
The presentation slides / digital materials / resources and handouts were high quality.
The content was relevant to / useful for my professional practice.
The activity contributed to my knowledge, skills, and capacity to enhance the delivery of patient care.
The overall quality of the educational activity was excellent.
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
LTC Jeanne Krick, MD, MA
*
Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree
1. Analyze and differentiate surrogate decision-making for pediatric patients and adult patients.
2. Apply the Harm Principle to assess decision-making in children.
3. Distinguish between consent and assent in the context of pediatric decision-making.
4. Define key principles of pediatric ethics and explain how they guide clinical decision-making in complex cases.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*